Opinion
No.2:10-CR-338 JAM
04-04-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS GREY, Defendant.
DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender DOUGLAS BEEVERS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant TRAVIS GREY BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LEE BICKLEY Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Federal Defender
DOUGLAS J. BEEVERS, #288639
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
TRAVIS GREY
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING
Date: May 7, 2013
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
The parties request that the revocation hearing in this case be continued from April 9, 2013, to May 7, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. They stipulate that the time between April 9, 2013 and May 7, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review and investigate the facts of the case. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL BRODERICK
Federal Defender
________________________
DOUGLAS BEEVERS
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
TRAVIS GREY
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
________________________
LEE BICKLEY
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the revocation hearing presently set for April 9, 2013, be continued to May 7, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. Based on the representation of counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the May 7, 2013, revocation hearing shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge