From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gregory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-00364 GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cr-00364 GEB

03-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIMEON SHAWNISE GREGORY SARAH ELIZABETH TROUT TERRANCE RYCHAN SMALLS THERESA H. CAMPBELL Defendants.

BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney JARED C. DOLAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff STEVEN B. PLESSER Attorney for Defendant TERRANCE R. SMALLS DAVID D. FISCHER Attorney for Defendant SARAH ELIZABETH TROUT JEFFREY L. STANIELS Attorney for Defendant SIMEON SHAWNISE GREGORY OLAF HEDBERG Attorney for Defendant THERESA H. CAMPBELL


STEVEN PLESSER, State Bar #161615
THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK J. REICHEL
455 CAPITOL MALL, 3rd FLOOR, Suite 350
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-9258
FAX: (916) 441-6553
steve@reichellaw.com
Attorney for Defendant
TERRANCE R. SMALLS

AMENDED STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

AND REGARDING EXCLUDABLE

TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY

TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

THEREON


STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and the defendants, by and through each counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on March 22, 2013. 2. By this stipulation, all defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 3, 2013, and to exclude time between March 22, 2013 and May 3, 2013 under Local Code T4. This Amended Stipulation is meant to supercede the previously submitted Stipulation and Proposed Order and is identical in all respects except insofar as it adds Defendant Theresa H. Campbell to the Stipulation and Proposed Order. Plaintiff is unopposed. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The government has discovered in excess of three thousand pages of discovery. Additional discovery has been requested and is forthcoming but has not yet been produced.
b. Counsel for the defendants desires additional time to consult with their respective clients, to review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to review discovery, to discuss potential resolutions with their clients and the prosecution, to prepare pretrial motions, and to otherwise prepare for trial.
c. Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d. The government is unopposed to the continuance.
e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f. All counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation is lodged, through
May 3, 2013 should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.
g. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

STEVEN B. PLESSER for:

JARED C. DOLAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,

_____________

STEVEN B. PLESSER

Attorney for Defendant

TERRANCE R. SMALLS

Respectfully submitted,

STEVEN B. PLESSER

DAVID D. FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

SARAH ELIZABETH TROUT

Respectfully submitted,

STEVEN B. PLESSER

JEFFREY L. STANIELS

Attorney for Defendant

SIMEON SHAWNISE GREGORY

Respectfully submitted,

STEVEN B. PLESSER

OLAF HEDBERG

Attorney for Defendant

THERESA H. CAMPBELL

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

_____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Gregory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-00364 GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SIMEON SHAWNISE GREGORY SARAH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cr-00364 GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)