From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Greenblatt

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2021
17 Cr. 122 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

17 Cr. 122 (VSB)

12-09-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MENDY GREENBLATT, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DINA MCLEOD ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY MENDY GREENBLATT SAUL BIENENFELD, ESQ.


DAMIAN WILLIAMS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DINA MCLEOD ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

MENDY GREENBLATT

SAUL BIENENFELD, ESQ.

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

THE HONORABLE VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2017, MENDY GREENBLATT (the “defendant”) was charged in a two-count information (the “Information”), with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One); wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One, and Two, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amounts of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses that the defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2017, the defendant pleaded guilty to Counts One and Two of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Counts and Two of the Information;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $89,100.00 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses alleged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of the acts and/or omissions of the defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Dina McLeod, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Saul Bienenfeld. Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, to which the defendant pleaded guilty, a money judgement in the amount of $89,100.00 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the defendant obtained, shall be entered against the defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the defendant, MENDY GREENBLATT, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance to the “United States Marshals Service, ” and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office. Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit. One St. Andrew's Plaza. New York. New York 10007 and shall indicate the defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander J. Wilson, Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.

9. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Greenblatt

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2021
17 Cr. 122 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Greenblatt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MENDY GREENBLATT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

17 Cr. 122 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2021)