From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2021
Case No. 07-20411 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 07-20411

03-29-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER GREEN, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

The court has received a request from Christopher Green for compassionate release, primarily based upon the COVID-19 pandemic, and for the appointment of counsel. The government has responded to Green's request for compassionate release. Green urges the court to appoint counsel for him so that he may reply to the government and present his case.

The appointment of counsel for postconviction proceedings is a matter of the court's discretion, not a constitutional right. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Lemeshko v. Wrona, 325 F. Supp.2d 778, 787 (E.D. Mich. 2004) (court may appoint counsel for habeas petitioner "only where the interests of justice or due process so require"); United States v. Prater, 2020 WL 2616120, at *2 (E.D. Ky. May 22, 2020) ("There is no constitutional right to counsel in proceedings filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582."). When a petitioner has not articulated a colorable claim, the appointment of counsel would not serve the interests of justice. Lemeshko, 325 F. Supp.2d at 788.

Based upon the record presented thus far, it does not appear that Green has a colorable claim for compassionate release. In order to grant compassionate release, the court must find an "extraordinary and compelling" reason to do so, among other requirements. See United States v. Elias, 984 F.3d 516, 518 (6th Cir. 2021). Some courts have found that chronic, serious health conditions that increase the risk of severe complications from COVID-19 constitute extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. See, e.g., United States v. Hargrove, 2021 WL 509905, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 11, 2021) (heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and severe obesity, among other ailments). In this case, however, Green has already contracted COVID-19 and recovered. Such circumstances do not support compassionate release. See United States v. Stephens, 2020 WL 5769125, at *6 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 28, 2020) ("[M]any courts have held that where a defendant has contracted COVID-19 and recovered, his health condition is not extraordinary and compelling."). Prior to making a final determination on the merits of his compassionate release motion, however, the court will accept further briefing and exhibits from Green.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Green's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 334, 335) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Green may submit a reply brief and exhibits in support of his request for compassionate release by April 30, 2021. Dated: March 29, 2021

s/George Caram Steeh

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 29, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also

on Christopher Green #42181039, McKean Federal

Correctional Institution, Inmate Mail/Parcels,

P.O. Box 8000, Bradford, PA 16701.


s/B. Sauve

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Green

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 29, 2021
Case No. 07-20411 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Green

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER GREEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 29, 2021

Citations

Case No. 07-20411 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Stewart

(See ECF No. 25, PageID.113.) “The appointment of counsel for postconviction proceedings is a matter of the…

United States v. Butler

(See ECF No. 38, PageID.179; ECF No. 48, PageID.423.) “The appointment of counsel for postconviction…