From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gray

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 12, 2023
CR-18-01695-002-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2023)

Opinion

CR-18-01695-002-TUC-JAS (EJM)

12-12-2023

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Marcell Demetrius Gray, Defendant.


ORDER

HONORABLE JAMES A. SOTO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Markovich (Doc. 2557) that recommends denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Outrageous Government Conduct (Doc. 1123). A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. Therefore, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Markovich's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2557) is accepted and adopted.
(2) Defendant's Motion (Doc. 1123) is denied.
(3) This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich.


Summaries of

United States v. Gray

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 12, 2023
CR-18-01695-002-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Marcell Demetrius Gray, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Dec 12, 2023

Citations

CR-18-01695-002-TUC-JAS (EJM) (D. Ariz. Dec. 12, 2023)