From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gorman

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 1, 1970
431 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 30068.

September 1, 1970.

Ross T. Scaccia, New Orleans, La. (court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., Robert L. Livingston, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from the District Court's denial of Gorman's motion to correct or reduce sentence, pursuant to Rule 35, F. R.Crim.P.

On January 31, 1969, more than ten months after he was sentenced, Gorman first requested the court below to modify his sentence. Since Gorman's motion was not filed within 120 days of his sentence, as required by Rule 35, the District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion; and therefore this Court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. Rule 45(b), F.R.Crim.P.; United States v. Ellenbogen, 2 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 537, cert. denied 1968, 393 U.S. 918, 89 S.Ct. 241, 21 L.Ed.2d 206.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Gorman

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 1, 1970
431 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Gorman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. GORMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 1, 1970

Citations

431 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States v. Norton

We have consistently held that the 120-day time limit is jurisdictional. United States v. Gorman, 5 Cir.,…

United States v. Lee

        With all deference to Judge Whipple, we remain convinced that the alteration of a sentence to include…