Opinion
No. 16-3135
12-28-2016
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville [Unpublished] Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Debra Goodman appeals after she pleaded guilty to a passport-related offense and the district court imposed a sentence including a within-Guidelines-range prison term and a fine. Her counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that the district court plainly erred in imposing the fine, due to Goodman's inability to pay. Goodman has filed a pro se brief challenging the fine, asserting procedural errors in the Guidelines calculations, and arguing that she should have been sentenced to probation. She also has filed a motion essentially seeking appointment of new counsel.
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. --------
Upon careful review, we conclude that there is no basis on which to set aside any aspect of Goodman's sentence. See United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 759-60 (8th Cir. 2014) (within-Guidelines-range prison term may be presumed reasonable); United States v. Allmon, 500 F.3d 800, 807-08 (8th Cir. 2007) (discussing review of fines). Furthermore, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we deny Goodman's motion, grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.