From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gooden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2015
CR. S 2:07-cr-483 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, HANNAH R. LABAREE, Assistant Federal Defender, Counsel Designated for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant, CHARLES GOODEN.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Defendant, CHARLES GOODEN, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On January 13, 2009, this Court sentenced Mr. Gooden to a term of 108 months imprisonment;

         3. Mr. Gooden's total offense level was 29, his criminal history category was III, and the resulting guideline range was 108 to 135 months;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Gooden was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973;

         5. Mr. Gooden's total offense level has been reduced from 29 to 27, and his amended guideline range is 87 to 108 months;

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Gooden's term of imprisonment to a term of 87 months.

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Gooden is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 29 to 27, resulting in an amended guideline range of 87 to 108 months.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in January 2009 is reduced to a term of 87 months.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Gooden shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.


Summaries of

United States v. Gooden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2015
CR. S 2:07-cr-483 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Gooden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES GOODEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

CR. S 2:07-cr-483 TLN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)