From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez-Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-0432 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cr-0432 JAM

04-18-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO GONZALEZ-MORAN and GILBERTO LORENZO LUVIO Defendants.

J. PATRICK McCARTHY, Attorney for Defendant Gilberto Lorenzo Luvio MICHAEL McCOY, Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, Attorney for Defendant, Arturo Gonzalez-Moran


J. PATRICK McCARTHY
Attorney at Law, #41920
901 H Street, Suite 304
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 442-1932
Attorney for Defendant, Gilberto Lorenzo Luvio

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME


Date: June 11, 2013

Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Michael McCoy, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff; Benjamin Galloway, attorney for defendant Arturo Gonzalez-Moran, and J. Patrick McCarthy, attorney for defendant Gilberto Lorenzo Luvio, that the current Status Conference set for April 23, 2013 be continued to June 11, 2013 at 9:45 am.

The continuance is being requested because the parties need more time to evaluate the evidence and to seek resolution of the case. The attorneys continue to accumulate additional information which must be considered in the evaluation process.

It is further stipulated and agreed between the parties that the period beginning April 23, 2013 to June 11, 2013, should be excluded in computing the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act for preparation of counsel. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 (h)(8)(iv) (Local Code T4). The ends of justice served by the granting of this continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Mr. McCoy and Mr. Galloway have authorized Mr. McCarthy to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

J. PATRICK McCARTHY, Attorney for

Defendant Gilberto Lorenzo Luvio

________________________

MICHAEL McCOY,

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

________________________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY,

Assistant Federal Defender, Attorney for

Defendant, Arturo Gonzalez-Moran

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez-Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cr-0432 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez-Moran

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO GONZALEZ-MORAN and GILBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cr-0432 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2013)