From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 28, 2013
2:13-CR-000026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)

Opinion

          TONI H. CARBONE, (SBN 210119) ATTORNEY AT LAW, Auburn, CA, Attorney for Defendant EVERARDO REGALADO.

          DOUGLAS BEEVERS, Attorney for Defendant ROBERTO GONZALEZ.

          STAN KUBOCHI, Attorney for Defendant CORINA DOMINGUEZ.


          [PROPOSED ORDER] CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         The parties hereby stipulate the following:

1. Status Conference in this matter is presently set for June 28, 2013. Counsel for the above-referenced defendants and counsel for the Government request that the date for status be continued to August 9, 2013. As of this date, discovery stands at 1, 400 pages of written reports in addition to two wiretaps of recorded phone calls. Pre-plea investigation and reports have been done in this case regarding the number of illegal aliens that were allegedly harbored and the scope of the criminal enterprise. These reports act as an aid to counsel for the defendants and the Government in terms of resolution. This continuance is requested to allow counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case, to review the pre-plea investigation reports and to work towards resolution and/or prepare for trial.

2. Counsel for the parties agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/reasonable time for effective preparation, specifically the parties are working towards a resolution) and Local Code T4 (time for defense counsel to prepare) and that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. The parties agree to exclude time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, August 9, 2013.

3. The parties agree to continue the status conference to August 9, 2013.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the date for the status conference of the above-named defendants be continued from June 28, 2013 to August 9, 2013. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (continuity of counsel/reasonable time for effective preparation, specifically the parties are working towards a resolution) and Local Code T4 (time for defense counsel to prepare) and that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. Time is excluded time from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the status conference, August 9, 2013.


Summaries of

United States v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 28, 2013
2:13-CR-000026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GONZALEZ, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

2:13-CR-000026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2013)