From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gomez-Gomez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2015
Cr. F 09-339 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, DAVID M. PORTER, Assistant Federal Defender, Counsel Designated for Service Sacramento, California Attorneys for Defendant MIGUEL GOMEZ-GOMEZ.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, KATHLEEN A. SERVATIUS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         Defendant, MIGUEL GOMEZ-GOMEZ by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen A. Servatius, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On August 20, 2012, this Court sentenced Mr. Gomez-Gomez to a term of 108 months, 27 days imprisonment;

         3. His total offense level was 31, his criminal history category was II, and the resulting guideline range was 121 to 151 months. He received a reduction from the low end of the applicable guideline range on the government's motion;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Gomez-Gomez was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973;

         5. Mr. Gomez-Gomez' total offense level has been reduced from 31 to 29, and his amended guideline range is 97 to 121 months. A reduction comparable to the one received at the initial sentencing would produce a term of 88 months; and,

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Gomez-Gomez' term of imprisonment to 88 months.

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Gomez-Gomez is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 31 to 29, resulting in an amended guideline range of 97 to 121 months. A reduction comparable to the one received at the initial sentencing would produce a term of 88 months.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in August 2012 is reduced to a term of 88 months.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Gomez-Gomez shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Gomez-Gomez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2015
Cr. F 09-339 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Gomez-Gomez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL GOMEZ-GOMEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

Cr. F 09-339 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2015)