From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Goff

United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
Jul 31, 2023
6:23-CR-12-REW-HAI (E.D. Ky. Jul. 31, 2023)

Opinion

6:23-CR-12-REW-HAI

07-31-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY GOFF, Defendant.


ORDER

ROBERT E. WIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After conducting Rule 11 proceedings, see DE 36 (Minute Entry), Judge Ingram recommended that the undersigned accept Defendant Bobby Goff's guilty plea and adjudge her guilty of Count Two of the Indictment (DE 1). See DE 37 (Recommendation); see also DE 39 (Plea Agreement). Judge Ingram expressly informed Defendant of her right to object to the recommendation and to secure de novo review from the undersigned. See DE 37 at 2-3. The established three-day objection deadline has passed, and no party has objected.

The Court is not required to “review . . . a magistrate[ judge]'s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.” Thomas v. Arn, 106 S.Ct. 466, 472 (1985); see also Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019) (quoting Kensu v. Haigh, 87 F.3d 172, 176 (6th Cir. 1996)) (alterations adopted) (noting that the Sixth Circuit has “long held that, when a defendant does ‘not raise an argument in his objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation he has forfeited his right to raise this issue on appeal.'”); United States v. Olano, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 1777 (1993) (distinguishing waiver and forfeiture); FED. R. CRIM. P. 59(b)(2)-(3) (limiting de novo review duty to “any objection” filed); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (limiting de novo review duty to “those portions” of the recommendation “to which objection is made”).

The Court thus, with no objection from any party and on full review of the record, ORDERS as follows:

1. The Court ADOPTS DE 37, ACCEPTS Defendant's guilty plea, and ADJUDGES Defendant guilty of Count Two of the Indictment (DE 1); and

2. The Court will issue a separate sentencing order.

Judge Ingram remanded Goff to custody post-plea, which preserved her status following arraignment. See DE 17; DE 36. As such, Goff will remain in custody pending sentencing, subject to intervening orders.


Summaries of

United States v. Goff

United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
Jul 31, 2023
6:23-CR-12-REW-HAI (E.D. Ky. Jul. 31, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Goff

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY GOFF, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky

Date published: Jul 31, 2023

Citations

6:23-CR-12-REW-HAI (E.D. Ky. Jul. 31, 2023)