From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Glover

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2017
CAUSE NO. 2:16-CR-174-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 2:16-CR-174-JTM-JEM

10-19-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYLAN GLOVER, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT DYLAN GLOVER TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Dylan Glover's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge John E. Martin on October 19, 2017, with the consent of Defendant Glover, counsel for Defendant Glover, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Glover's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Glover under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Glover,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Dylan Glover understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Dylan Glover understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Dylan Glover understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Dylan Glover understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Dylan Glover has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Dylan Glover is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Dylan Glover understands that his answers may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Dylan Glover's plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Dylan Glover's plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 14 of the Second Superseding Indictment and that Defendant Dylan Glover be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 14 of the Second Superseding Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Dylan Glover be adjudged guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be set at a later date by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 19th day of October, 2017.

s/ John E. Martin

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody


Summaries of

United States v. Glover

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2017
CAUSE NO. 2:16-CR-174-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Glover

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYLAN GLOVER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 2:16-CR-174-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2017)