From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Glisson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Mar 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:08-405-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 3:08-405-JFA

03-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DECARDIO GLISSON


ORDER

The defendant has filed a motion for free copies "under the FOIA" (Freedom of Information Act) of the indictment, jury instructions, transcripts, and the like from his criminal case and trial. The defendant does indicate the reason he needs these copies, but it is possible that he may be preparing a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or some other post-judgment motion. The record reflects that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and sentence on February 8, 2012.

In the event the defendant files a § 2255 or other post judgment motion, he may then request copies of specific documents or transcripts. The court further notes that defendant is not precluded from filing a § 2255 motion merely because he does not have transcripts from his case. Indeed, § 2255 motions are frequently filed without the benefit of transcripts. If the defendant is interested in receiving specific transcripts or documents at his own expense prior to filing his § 2255 motion, he may contact the Clerk to request them. The Clerk will then advise the defendant of the cost of the copies which must be paid up-front and in full to the Clerk. If the defendant seeks a copy of his presentence report, he must write the United States Probation Office and request a copy from that office. If the defendant seeks a copy of the transcripts of his criminal proceedings, he must contact the court reporter directly and arrange for copies through the court reporter.

After the defendant files his § 2255 action indicating the issues raised, he may file a motion for free transcripts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) for consideration by the court. He is entitled to free copies of transcripts and documents in conjunction with a § 2255 action only if the court finds that his § 2255 claims are not frivolous and the documents are needed to decide the issues presented. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 753(f) (West 2008); United States v. Shoaf, 341 F.2d 832, 833-34 (4th Cir.1964) (indigent defendant must show some need for transcript beyond his mere desire to comb the record in hope of discovering errors to raise in habeas).

Accordingly, defendant's motion for free copies (ECF No. 281) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 7, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Glisson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Mar 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:08-405-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Glisson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DECARDIO GLISSON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 7, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 3:08-405-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2012)