From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Gherasim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00388-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00388-MCE

02-21-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GHERASIM, Defendant.

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA, State Bar No. 106193 Attorney at Law Attorney for Defendant Daniel Gherasim


WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA, State Bar No. 106193
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Defendant
Daniel Gherasim

STIPULATION REGARDING

EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT;

FINDINGS AND ORDER


Judge: Honorable Morrison C. England

With the Court's permission, defendant Daniel Gherasim and plaintiff United States of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 21, 2013;
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until April 4, 2013 and to exclude time between February 21, 2013 and April 4, 2013 under local code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate that the Court find that counsel for the defendant requires additional time to review the current charges, to review the extensive discovery, to conduct investigation and research related to the
charges and to prepare to discuss the matter with his client.
4. The government does not object to the continuance.
5. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed under the Speedy Trial Act.
6. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3161, et seq., within which the trial date must commence, the time period of February 21, 2013 to April 4, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) and Local Code T4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
7. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:

________________________

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA

Attorney for Daniel Gherasim

________________________

LEE BICKLEY

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Gherasim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00388-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Gherasim

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL GHERASIM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00388-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)