From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2016
No. 15-30089 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-30089

05-23-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CANDELARIO ALBERTO GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. CR-14-51-BLG-SPW MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge Argued and Submitted May 5, 2016 Portland, Oregon Before: TALLMAN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges and BATTAGLIA, District Judge.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. --------

Candelario Alberto Garcia entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence derived from a "knock and talk" encounter with police officers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Garcia's position that he was seized from the moment he encountered the officers at his door is unavailing. The encounter in this case is virtually identical to the encounter in United States v. Crapser, which this Court found to be voluntary and consensual. 472 F.3d 1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2007). The district court therefore correctly denied Garcia's motion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2016
No. 15-30089 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CANDELARIO ALBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 23, 2016

Citations

No. 15-30089 (9th Cir. May. 23, 2016)