From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00172 AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-00172 AWI-BAM-1

03-21-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LAUREL J. MONTOYA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330
Fresno, California 93721-2226
Telephone: (559) 487-5561
Attorneys for Defendant
LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON


Date: April 8, 2013

Judge: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, LAUREL J. MONTOYA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Luis Alberto Gonzalez, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to April 8, 2013, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is March 25, 2013. The requested new date is April 8, 2013.

Defense counsel Eric V. Kersten has been summons for jury duty on March 25, 2013 and may not be available to appear at the currently scheduled time. It is therefore requested that the upcoming status conference be continued to the next regularly scheduled law and motion calendar to allow for defense counsel's personal presence at the hearing.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the requested continuance shall be excluded as necessary for continuity of counsel and effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

By ____________

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00172 AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-00172 AWI-BAM-1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)