Opinion
SACR 24-0038-FWS-3
04-26-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OSCAR VARGAS GARCIA, Defendant.
ORDER OF DETENTION
ALKA SAGAR, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I.
On April 26, 2024, Defendant, assisted by a Spanish language interpreter, made his initial appearance on the indictment filed in this matter. Peter Swarth, a member of the indigent defense panel, was appointed to represent Defendant. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Joseph Guzman. A detention hearing was held.
[X] On motion of the Government [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)] in a case allegedly involving a narcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum sentence of ten or more years.
[] On motion by the Government or on the Court's own motion [ 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)] in a case allegedly involving a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
The Court concludes that the Government is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure i the defendant's appearance as required and the safety or any person or the community [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)].
II.
The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will i reasonably assure:
[X] the appearance of the defendant as required.
[X] the safety of any person or the community.
III.
The Court has considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)] The Court also considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing and the arguments of counsel, and the report and recommendation of the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency, issued on November 15, 2023 (at Defendant's initial appearance) and on November 20, 2023, at the detention hearing.
IV.
The Court bases its conclusions on the following:
As to risk of non-appearance:
[X] Defendant is a citizen of Mexico, has family ties to Mexico, and is in possession of a Mexican passport.
[X] Information regarding Defendant's residence is unverified: Defendant claims to be living with his aunt and cousin but his cousin and proposed surety state that Defendant only uses their address but lives in Bellflower; Defendant's expired driver's license lists a residence address in La Crescenta, CA.
[X] Defendant has no legal status in the United States.
[X] Substance use history unverified
[X] Unrebutted Presumption.
As to danger to the community:
[X] allegations in the indictment include Defendant's involvement in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and fentanyl, possess significant amounts of cash and firearms and ammunition.
[X] admitted marijuana use
[X] alleged to be associated with Sinaloa cartel
[X] Unrebutted Presumption.
V.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained until trial. The defendant will be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant will be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is confined will deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. [18 U.S.C. §3142(1)]