From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 2, 2020
CRIM. NO. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01 (D. Me. Dec. 2, 2020)

Opinion

CRIM. NO. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01

12-02-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. YARLIN GARCIA, DEFENDANTS


ORDER ON MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

On July 29, 2019, I sentenced Yarlin Garcia to 87 months in federal prison for drug trafficking. Judgment (ECF No. 161). He is currently incarcerated at FCI Fort Dix. His appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals is pending. United States v. Garcia, No. 19-1816 (1st Cir. appeal docketed Aug. 21, 2019) (case submitted on briefs Nov. 12, 2020).

Garcia has moved for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (ECF No. 199). A federal judge can reduce a sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) under certain circumstances. First, the prisoner must make the request to the Warden of the prison where he is housed, and thirty days must pass. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Second, the prisoner must show "extraordinary and compelling reasons." Id. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Third, the judge must consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to the extent they are applicable as well as applicable Sentencing Commission policy statements. Id. § 3582(c)(1)(A).

Here, Garcia has not shown me that thirty days have passed after making a request to the Warden. And the "extraordinary and compelling reasons" to which he refers are the conditions that all prisoners confront in this time of pandemic, not particular medical conditions of his own that increase his vulnerability.

I reject his argument that he need not make such a request because the application form FCI Fort Dix has issued is "incorrect." Mot. at 6-7. As for his citation of United States v. Goston, No. 15-20694, 2020 WL 5993235 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 9, 2020), the judge there declined to rule on whether the form justified bypassing the mandatory request to the Warden because there, like here, the defendant had not demonstrated extraordinary and compelling reasons in his own medical records. --------

At this time, I DENY Garcia's motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, i.e., the failure to make the request to the Warden.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 2, 2020
CRIM. NO. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01 (D. Me. Dec. 2, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. YARLIN GARCIA, DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Dec 2, 2020

Citations

CRIM. NO. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01 (D. Me. Dec. 2, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gordon

Id. § 3582(c)(1)(A). United States v. Garcia, No. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225910, at…

United States v. Cain

Id. § 3582(c)(1)(A).United States v. Garcia, No. 2:17-cr-100-DBH-01, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225910, at *1-2…