From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Freund

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 7, 1976
532 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1100.

June 1, 1976. Certiorari Denied June 7, 1976.

David R. Rosado, El Paso, Tex. (Court appointed), for defendant-appellant.

John E. Clark, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Frank B. Walker, William B. Hardie, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before WISDOM, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.


Pursuant to our remand order ( 525 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1976)) the district court conducted an in camera interview with the informant-witness and has now supplemented the record of this case with an order applying the balancing test of Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957). The court specifically found that the informant's testimony would corroborate the arresting officer's recital of events and "would be exceedingly harmful to and in no way helpful to defendant's claim of an illegal search and seizure."

This new information authenticates the trial court's holding that the search was predicated on probable cause and that the defendant had no right to require disclosure of the informant's identity.

Defendant's conviction is therefore

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Freund

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 7, 1976
532 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

United States v. Freund

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DAVID WAYNE FREUND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 1976

Citations

532 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

State v. Pena

(Emphasis supplied.) The state argues that, under federal constitutional law, when the court determines that…