From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fraide

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 19, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR1715-MMA (S.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR1715-MMA

06-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIKE RODRIGUEZ FRAIDE Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

(Rule 48, F.R.Crim.P.)

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

X an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice;
_ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal without prejudice; or
_ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
_ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
_ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
X of the offense(s) of: 8 USC 1324 (a) (1) (A) (ii) and (v)(II).

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged pursuant to Rule 48, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

____________________________

RUBEN B. BROOKS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ENTERED ON ____________________________


Summaries of

United States v. Fraide

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 19, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR1715-MMA (S.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Fraide

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIKE RODRIGUEZ FRAIDE Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR1715-MMA (S.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2012)