From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Folden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:11-CR-87-02 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-CR-87-02

01-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA FOLDEN, Defendant.


ORDER CONTINUING PROBATION

On September 14, 2012, the Defendant appeared in open Court and admitted to the allegations as set forth in the Petition directing him to show cause why his probation, a status that began November 16, 2011, should not be revoked. The Defendant was found to be in violation of his probation supervision and the Court set the matter for final disposition. At the final disposition, held October 17, 2012, a Joint Oral Motion for a Psychological Examination was made to which the Court granted. Defendant was remanded into custody of the United States Marshal Service and final disposition was reset pending receipt of the examination report. Upon receipt of the report, final disposition was then set for January 23, 2013. Defendant appeared in open Court for final disposition on January 23, 2013, at which time the Court chose not to revoke his probation.

IT IS THE ORDER OF THE COURT that the Defendant be continued on probation with all conditions as previously imposed and that he be immediately released from custody. Following the conclusion of the proceedings, Defendant was orally explained his right of appeal and indicated understanding of same.

_______________

Thomas M. Rose, Judge

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Folden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:11-CR-87-02 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Folden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA FOLDEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-CR-87-02 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)