From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Flying

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Dec 5, 2017
CR-10-05-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Dec. 5, 2017)

Opinion

CR-10-05-BMM-01

12-05-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN MARK FLYING, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on November 20, 2017. (Doc. 84.) Neither party filed objections. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 153-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Judge Johnston conducted a final revocation hearing on October 23, 2017. (Doc. 80.) Flying admitted that he violated the conditions of his supervised release. (Doc. 84 at 1.) Flying violated the conditions of his supervised release by 1) committing a new crime on February 4, 2017; 2) failing to report for random urinalysis testing on January 29, 2017; 3) failing to report for mental health treatment on January 27, 2017; and 4) associating with a convicted felon on February 4, 2017. (Doc. 84 at 1-2). Flying denied any conduct relating to events in Judith Basin County in the first alleged violation. Id. at 3. The United States did not put on evidence regarding this allegation. Judge Johnston recommends that the Court revoke Flying's supervised release. Id. at 4. Further, Judge Johnston has recommends that Flying be sentenced to fourteen months imprisonment to run consecutive with his current term of state imprisonment in Tenth Judicial District Court, Judith Basin County, DC-2017-02. Id. at 5. Judge Johnston further recommends no term of supervised release to follow. Id.

The Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations. Flying's violations of his conditions represent a serious breach of the Court's trust. The sentenced imposed, represents a sufficient, but not greater than necessary sentence.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 84) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Dustin Mark Flying be sentenced to fourteen months imprisonment to run consecutive with his current term of state imprisonment, Tenth Judicial District Court, Judith Basin County, DC-2017-02, followed by no term of supervised release.

DATED this 5th day of December, 2017.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Flying

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Dec 5, 2017
CR-10-05-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Dec. 5, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Flying

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN MARK FLYING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2017

Citations

CR-10-05-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Dec. 5, 2017)