From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fine

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 6, 1992
963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992)

Summary

recognizing that district courts have inherent power to manage their dockets without being subject to noncompliant litigants

Summary of this case from Kilpatrick v. Mitchelle

Opinion

No. 90-50280.

May 6, 1992.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.


Summaries of

United States v. Fine

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 6, 1992
963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992)

recognizing that district courts have inherent power to manage their dockets without being subject to noncompliant litigants

Summary of this case from Kilpatrick v. Mitchelle
Case details for

United States v. Fine

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROBERT FINE, AKA: ANOSH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 6, 1992

Citations

963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Kilpatrick v. Mitchelle

Case law is in accord that a district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a…

Roberson v. Tilton

Finally, plaintiff is advised that a first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. United States…