From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fifer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2016
650 F. App'x 472 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-30214

05-23-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ORAY PAPA FIFER, a.k.a. Duwayne Harris, a.k.a. Shawn Phillips, a.k.a. Special, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:99-cr-00014-CCL-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Charles C. Lovell, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Oray Papa Fifer appeals from the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fifer's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fifer the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. He has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Fifer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 23, 2016
650 F. App'x 472 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Fifer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ORAY PAPA FIFER, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 23, 2016

Citations

650 F. App'x 472 (9th Cir. 2016)