From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 10, 2012
No. 11-cr-306 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-cr-306 (MJD/LIB)

01-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS NEIL FERGUSON., Defendant.

Clifford B. Wardlaw, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Plaintiff. Manny K. Atwal, Office of the Federal Defender, and Kevin M. Magnuson, Kelley, Wolter & Scott, PA, Counsel for Defendant.


ORDER

Clifford B. Wardlaw, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Plaintiff. Manny K. Atwal, Office of the Federal Defender, and Kevin M. Magnuson, Kelley, Wolter & Scott, PA, Counsel for Defendant.

I. Introduction

This matter is before the court on Defendant Chris Neil Ferguson's motions to bifurcate proceedings and to exclude Rule 404(b) evidence. [Docket No. 20.]

Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate Proceedings [Docket No. 20] is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion to exclude evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) [Docket No. 20] is DENIED AS MOOT because the Government has not moved to admit any such evidence.

____________

Michael J. Davis

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 10, 2012
No. 11-cr-306 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS NEIL FERGUSON., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. 11-cr-306 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2012)