From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Esteves

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 20, 2023
2:22-MC-00280 MCE DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-MC-00280 MCE DB

06-20-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACOB DAVID ESTEVES, Debtor. FORGEN, LLC, and its Successors and Assignees Garnishee.


FINAL ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 19, 2022, the United States filed an Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment against twenty-five percent (25%) of Jacob David Esteves' (“Debtor”) non-exempt disposable earnings, and it requested to receive the statutorily authorized litigation surcharge. ECF 1.

The Clerk of the Court issued the Writ and Clerk's Notice to Debtor. ECF 3. The United States served the Writ and related documents on Forgen, LLC (“Garnishee”) and Debtor. ECF 4 and 5.

On October 4, 2022, Garnishee served its Acknowledgment of Service and Answer of Garnishee on Debtor and the United States (“Answer”). ECF 7. In its Answer, Garnishee stated that Jacob David Esteves is an employee of Garnishee and pays earnings to Debtor. ECF 7. Debtor did not file a claim of exemption to the proposed garnishment or request a hearing, did not object to Garnishee's Answer, and did not otherwise object to the United States' garnishment action.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302, on May 23, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that recommended that the United States' request for final order of continuing garnishment be granted and ordered that any objections were due within 14 days after service. ECF 10. The United States served the findings and recommendations on Debtor's attorney, Tim Zindel on May 24, 2023. ECF 11. Debtor did not object and the time to do so has passed.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Findings and Recommendations for Final Order of Continuing Garnishment (ECF 10) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Forgen, LLC is directed to pay the Clerk of the United States District Court twenty-five percent (25%) of Jacob David Esteves' ongoing and non-exempt disposable earnings, including, but not limited to wages, earnings, commissions, and bonuses;

3. Forgen LLC is directed to pay the Clerk of the United States District Court the amount of non-exempt disposable earnings, including, but not limited to wages, earnings, commissions, and bonuses, already withheld as a result of the writ, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of this Final Order of Garnishment. Payment shall be made in the form of a check, money order, or company draft, made payable to the “Clerk of the Court” and delivered to:

Office of the Clerk
501 I St., Rm. 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814

The criminal docket number (2:06-cr-00200 MCE) shall be stated on the payment instrument;

4. The United States shall be entitled to recover a $40,672.15 litigation surcharge after satisfaction of the judgment amount owed by Jacob David Esteves;

5. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve matters through ancillary proceedings in the case, if necessary; and

6. The garnishment shall terminate when (1) the United States seeks to terminate the writ or (2) when the judgment amount and litigation surcharge are fully satisfied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Esteves

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 20, 2023
2:22-MC-00280 MCE DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Esteves

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACOB DAVID ESTEVES, Debtor…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-MC-00280 MCE DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)