From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Espinoza-Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
NO. 1:12-cr-00295 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:12-cr-00295 LJO

01-18-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ONOFRE ESPINOZA-TORRES, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692 Acting Federal Defender ANDRAS FARKAS, CA Bar #254302 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant ONOFRE ESPINOZA-TORRES


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ANDRAS FARKAS, CA Bar #254302
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
ONOFRE ESPINOZA-TORRES

STIPULATION TO RE-SET SENTENCING

SCHEDULE AND HEARING;

ORDER


Date: February 25, 2013

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that a new sentencing schedule be set as follows:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event: ¦Present Date: ¦Requested New Date: ¦ +---------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------¦ ¦Informal Objections ¦January 18, 2013 ¦February 1, 2013 ¦ ¦Due ¦ ¦ ¦ +---------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------¦ ¦Formal Objections Due¦February 4, 2013 ¦February 19, 2013 ¦ +---------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------¦ ¦Sentencing Hearing ¦February 11, 2010 - 8:30 ¦February 25, 2013 - 8:30 ¦ ¦ ¦A.M. ¦A.M. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

This Stipulation is entered into at the request of Counsel for Defendant. Counsel was ill and out of the office the week of January 8 - 11, 2013. Counsel is the Assistant Federal Defender assigned to duty at the U.S. Magistrate Court in Yosemite, and was, for that reason, again out of his office from Monday afternoon, January 14th until Thursday, January 17, 2013. Counsel has not yet had an opportunity to meet with Defendant to discuss the Presentence Investigation Report, and needs additional time to do so prior to preparing any appropriate objections on Defendant's behalf. Assistant United States Attorney Kevin P. Rooney has no objection to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.

Because this is a sentencing hearing, no waiver of time pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) is required.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ____________

KEVIN P. ROONEY

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Public Defender

By: ____________

ANDRAS FARKAS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

ONOFRE ESPINOZA-TORRES

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the sentencing schedule shall be and is hereby modified as set forth above and the sentencing hearing now scheduled for February 11, 2013 is hereby continued to February 25, 2013 at 8:30 A.M. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Espinoza-Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
NO. 1:12-cr-00295 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Espinoza-Torres

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ONOFRE ESPINOZA-TORRES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:12-cr-00295 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)