From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Escamilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 LJO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 LJO

03-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO ESCAMILLA, Defendant.

LAUREL MONTOYA Assistant United States Attorney ROGER K. LITMAN Attorney for Defendant RICARDO ESCAMILLA


ROGER K. LITMAN, 57634
Attorney at Law
Civic Center Square
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 230
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 237-6000
Attorney for Defendant, RICARDO ESCAMILLA

STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING

The parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate and agree that the sentencing in this matter, currently calendared for March 11, 2013, be continued to March 25, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.

Informal objections by the defense resulted in revisions to the pretrial sentence report. Defense counsel is awaiting the revised version of the report. The additional time agreed to by the parties will afford defense counsel an opportunity to review the revised report with Mr. Escamilla.

The parties also agree that any delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(1)(F), 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(I).

_____________

LAUREL MONTOYA

Assistant United States Attorney

This was agreed to by Ms. Montoya

via telephone on March 7, 2013

_____________

ROGER K. LITMAN

Attorney for Defendant

RICARDO ESCAMILLA
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Escamilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 LJO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Escamilla

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO ESCAMILLA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 LJO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)