From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Elliott

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2023
5:22-po-00146-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2023)

Opinion

5:22-po-00146-CDB

06-02-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ASHLEY L. ELLIOTT, Defendant.

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, CA Bar #122664 Federal Defender ERIN SNIDER, CA Bar #304781 Assistant Federal Defender Office of the Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant ASHLEY L. ELLIOTT PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney CHAN HEE CHU Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, CA Bar #122664 Federal Defender ERIN SNIDER, CA Bar #304781 Assistant Federal Defender Office of the Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant ASHLEY L. ELLIOTT

PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney CHAN HEE CHU Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF PROBATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

On December 6, 2023, defendant Ashley L. Elliott pled guilty to a violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.22(a)(3), unsafe operation of a motor vehicle. That same date, the Court sentenced Ms. Elliott to 12 months of unsupervised probation, with the conditions that Ms. Elliott obey all laws; pay a $500 fine, $30 processing fee, and $10 special assessment, for a total financial obligation of $540, due by June 6, 2023; and attend AA or an equivalent program one time per week for six weeks beginning no later than January 3, 2023. The Court also ordered Ms. Elliott to submit a status report to the Court by June 6, 2023, documenting her compliance with the conditions of probation. At the sentencing hearing, the Court noted that, if Ms. Elliott paid the financial obligation in full and attended AA or an equivalent program as instructed, “we may be in a position to talk about early termination of probation.”

Pursuant to the Court's order, the parties hereby file this status report. As evidenced by Exhibit A, Ms. Elliott timely paid the $540 ordered by this Court. Moreover, on April 18, 2023, Ms. Elliott, through counsel, filed proof of attendance at six Alcoholics Anonymous meetings between December 12, 2022, and February 13, 2023. See ECF #19. Finally, counsel for the government has run a criminal history check and confirmed that Ms. Elliott has obeyed all laws while on probation, with the exception of a January 21, 2023 traffic infraction that she promptly reported to the government. The traffic infraction was a speeding violation (75 in a 65 mile-per-hour zone) and Ms. Elliott has paid the ticket.

In light of Ms. Elliott's compliance, the parties jointly move for early termination of her term of probation. Title 18, United States Code, Section 3564(c) grants this Court the power to terminate a term of probation at any time in a misdemeanor case, pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 32.1(c) , provided the Court is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the defendant and in the interests of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3564(c); see also United States v. Ponce, 22 F.4th 1045 (9th Cir. 2022) (clarifying that early termination of supervised release is not just reserved for rare cases involving exceptionally good behavior).

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(c)(1) generally requires “a hearing, at which the person has the right to counsel and an opportunity to make a statement and present any information in mitigation.” However, no hearing is required if the defendant waives the hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)(A). Nor is a hearing required if the relief is favorable to the defendant and the government does not object. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)(A) and(B). Under both provisions, no hearing is required here.

In this case, Ms. Elliott's conduct and the interests of justice warrant early termination. Since this Court last saw her on December 6, 2023, Ms. Elliott graduated from the HVAC certification program she was attending at the time of her sentencing hearing, and she is currently working on the maintenance team at the resort in Death Valley National Park. She has plans to move out of state in December to pursue a better paying job. Furthermore, Ms. Elliott recently celebrated seven months of sobriety. In light of Ms. Elliott's progress over the last six months and her compliance with the conditions of probation, the parties agree that early termination of probation is warranted.

ORDER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3564(c), the Court hereby terminates Defendant Ashley Elliott's term of probation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Elliott

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2023
5:22-po-00146-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ASHLEY L. ELLIOTT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2023

Citations

5:22-po-00146-CDB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2023)