From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Elkins

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Nov 9, 2023
3:23-CR-141-SA-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 9, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-CR-141-SA-RP

11-09-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. JUSTIN ELKINS DEFENDANT


ORDER

ROY PERCY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court is the Defendant Justin Elkin's Unopposed Motion to Waive Local Counsel Requirement [ECF #6] and the applications to have Attorneys Leah H. Mayersohn and Mario A. Machado appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant. ECF #7, 8. Having reviewed the applications and the record, the court finds that the requirements of Local Uniform Civil Rule 83.1(d) have been met, except for the requirement of associating local counsel, which requirement the defendant requests be waived under Local Unform Criminal Rule 44.1. The court finds that counsel's pro hac vice applications and the defendant's motion to waive the requirement of local counsel are well taken and are hereby GRANTED.

Counsel is advised that admission pro hac vice shall be conditional upon completion of the process of registration to be served electronically with orders and notices from the court, as well as electronically filing a Notice of Attorney Appearance. Failure to comply with these additional requirements will result in revocation of admission pro hac vice. If counsel has not already completed the registration process, counsel must do so within fourteen days of the date of this order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Elkins

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Nov 9, 2023
3:23-CR-141-SA-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 9, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Elkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. JUSTIN ELKINS DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2023

Citations

3:23-CR-141-SA-RP (N.D. Miss. Nov. 9, 2023)