From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Eisom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 6, 2011
No. 2:07-cr-90-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cr-90-DBH

12-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILJON EISOM, DEFENDANT


ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On November 18, 2011, I ruled that the defendant Philjon Eisom did not qualify for any sentence reduction under the retroactive and more lenient crack cocaine Guideline that became effective November 1, 2011. Eisom filed a new motion for relief on December 2, 2011 (Docket Item 65), which I treat as a motion for reconsideration. The motion is DENIED for the reasons stated in my Order of November 18, 2011. Moreover, contrary to Eisom's belief, he did in fact receive the 2-level subtraction under Guideline § 2D1.1 comment n.10(D)(i) when he was originally sentenced in 2008, as is reflected in the Revised Presentence Report ¶ 15.

SO ORDERED.

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Eisom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 6, 2011
No. 2:07-cr-90-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Eisom

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILJON EISOM, DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

No. 2:07-cr-90-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 6, 2011)