From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Echeagaray-Leon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
167 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-01315-DCB/CRP.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Victor Echeagaray-Leon appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Echeagaray-Leon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Echeagaray-Leon has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our examination of the brief and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Echeagaray-Leon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
167 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Echeagaray-Leon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Victor ECHEAGARAY-LEON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

167 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2006)