United States v. Eason

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAYMELL LAMAR EASON, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 23, 2013

Cr. S-12-0241 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2013)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAYMELL LAMAR EASON, Defendant. No. Cr. S-12-0241 WBS United States District Court, E.D. California. October 23, 2013

          ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         Within fourteen days from the date of this Order, the United States shall file a response to defendant Eason's Motion to Dismiss Indictment. Defendant shall file his reply within ten days thereafter. The motion will then be taken under submission. The court recognizes that the motion is filed pro se and defendant is represented by counsel, but finds that proceeding in this way avoids all of the problems inherent in refusing to accept the motion for filing. The United States Attorney shall accordingly respond to the motion as if it were filed by counsel.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.