From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Duran-Alvarado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. 1:13-CR-00117 LJO (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:13-CR-00117 LJO

05-09-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROMAN MIGUEL DURAN-ALVARADO, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MIA A. GIACOMAZZI Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff HEATHER E. WILLIAMS Federal Defender JEROME PRICE Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant Roman M. Duran-Alvarado


HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Bar #122664
Acting Federal Defender
JEROME PRICE, Bar #282400
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330
Fresno, California 93721-2226
Telephone: (559) 487-5561
Attorney for Defendant
ROMAN MIGUEL DURAN-ALVARADO

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

REQUEST DENIED: TRIAL SETTING SET


Date: May 20, 2013

Judge: Hon. Sheila K. Oberto

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MIA A. GIACOMAZZI, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and JEROME PRICE, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Roman M. Duran-Alvarado, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to May 20, 2013, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is May 13, 2013, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill. The requested new date is May 20, 2013, before the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto.

The reason for this continuance is that we anticipate Mr. Duran-Alvarado will not change his plea. The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ______________________

MIA A. GIACOMAZZI

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS

Federal Defender

By ______________________

JEROME PRICE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

Roman M. Duran-Alvarado

ORDER

If the defendant will not be changing his plea, the status conference will not be continued off the docket of the undersigned. Instead, the currently set date and time for the status conference will now become a trial setting conference. Request DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Duran-Alvarado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. 1:13-CR-00117 LJO (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Duran-Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROMAN MIGUEL DURAN-ALVARADO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

No. 1:13-CR-00117 LJO (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)