From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Drayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 28, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 10-20018-01-KHV (D. Kan. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 10-20018-01-KHV

08-28-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMONT T. DRAYTON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On March 22, 2011, the Court sentenced defendant to 240 months in prison. On October 19, 2011, the Tenth Circuit dismissed defendant's appeal based on his waiver in the plea agreement. This matter is before the Court on defendant's letter (Doc. #107) filed July 17, 2012, which the Court construes as a motion for copies of transcripts and court documents.

In his motions, defendant asks for copies of transcripts and a co-defendant's plea agreement. To the extent that defendant is willing to pay for copies, he should send a request to the Clerk's Office, United States Courthouse, 500 State Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101. To the extent that defendant seeks free copies, defendant has not shown that absent the documents, he cannot prepare a Section 2255 motion. Absent a showing of a particularized need, the Court generally does not provide copies of transcripts or other information to indigent prisoners. Rule 7 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings (if motion not summarily dismissed, court may order expansion of record to include additional materials relevant to motion); see 28 U.S.C. § 753 (fees for transcripts paid by United States if judge certifies that suit or appeal is not frivolous and that transcript is needed to decide issue presented); 28 U.S.C. § 2250 (United States shall furnish without cost to indigent prisoner such documents as judge may require); Brown v. N.M. Dist. Court Clerks, 141 F.3d 1184, 1998 WL 123064, at *3 n.1 (10th Cir. Mar. 19, 1998) (to obtain free copy of transcript, habeas petitioner must demonstrate claim not frivolous and materials needed to decide issue presented by suit); United States v. Sistrunk, 992 F.2d 258, 260 (10th Cir. 1993) (under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), indigent defendant entitled to free copy of transcript on showing of particularized need); Ruark v. Gunter, 958 F.2d 318, 319 (10th Cir. 1992) (prisoner does not have right to free transcript simply to search for error in record); see also United States v. Horvath, 157 F.3d 131, 132 (2d Cir. 1998) (motion for free transcript under Section 753 not ripe until Section 2255 motion has been filed). The Court therefore overrules defendant's request for free copies of transcripts and his co-defendant's plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's letter (Doc. #107) filed July 17, 2012, which the Court construes as a motion for copies of transcripts and court documents, be and hereby is OVERRULED.

Dated this 28th day of August, 2012, at Kansas City, Kansas.

_________________

KATHRYN H. VRATIL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Drayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Aug 28, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 10-20018-01-KHV (D. Kan. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Drayton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMONT T. DRAYTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 10-20018-01-KHV (D. Kan. Aug. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

In other words, the plea agreement permits all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel (not only those…

United States v. Daniels

Plea Agreement (Doc. #234) ¶ 13. Because defendant's claims relate to ineffective assistance of counsel, the…