From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Doll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Sep 17, 2019
4:19CR3012 (D. Neb. Sep. 17, 2019)

Opinion

4:19CR3012

09-17-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID E. DOLL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the findings and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart on August 30, 2019 (Filing 25).

Judge Zwart recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Filing 20) be denied in its entirety. No objections have been filed to the findings and recommendation, and the matter is now ripe for decision under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I find and conclude after de novo review that Judge Zwart has correctly found the facts and applied the law. Her findings and recommendation therefore will be adopted, and Defendant's motion will be denied in its entirety.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (Filing 25) are adopted.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Filing 20) is denied in its entirety.

DATED this 17th day of September, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Doll

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Sep 17, 2019
4:19CR3012 (D. Neb. Sep. 17, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Doll

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID E. DOLL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Sep 17, 2019

Citations

4:19CR3012 (D. Neb. Sep. 17, 2019)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rief

Nevertheless, the Court also agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that for each of the quarters at…

United States v. Carnes

The court also concluded that the net effect of the § 6513 language is to prolong the limitations period…