From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Do

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2013
2:11-CR-00517 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

2:11-CR-00517

03-01-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICK DO, Defendant.

ERIN J. RADEKIN Attorney at Law - SBN 214964 Attorney for Defendant NICK DO


ERIN J. RADEKIN
Attorney at Law - SBN 214964
Attorney for Defendant
NICK DO

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE


STIPULATION

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris, and defendant, Nick Do, by and through his counsel, Erin J. Radekin, agree and stipulate to vacate the date set for status conference, March 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., in courtroom 10 in the above-captioned matter, and to continue the status conference to March 29, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in the courtroom of the Honorable Garland E. Burrell.

The reason for this request is that Ms. Radekin and Mr. Morris need additional time for plea negotiations, and Ms. Radekin needs to meet with her client to discuss any resolution. The Court is advised that Mr. Morris concurs with this request and has authorized Ms. Radekin to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

The parties further agree and stipulate that the time period from the filing of this stipulation until March 29, 2013 should be excluded in computing time for commencement of trial under the Speedy Trial Act, based upon the interest of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. It is further agreed and stipulated that the ends of justice served in granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

By:___________________________

MATTHEW MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

________________________

ERIN J. RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

NICK DO

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying stipulation and declaration of counsel, the status conference date of March 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED and the above-captioned matter is set for status conference on March 29, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds excludable time in this matter through March 29, 2013 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective defense preparation. For the reasons stipulated by the parties, the Court finds that the interest of justice served by granting the request outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Do

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2013
2:11-CR-00517 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Do

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICK DO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

2:11-CR-00517 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)