From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dilworth

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Mar 13, 2024
Criminal 22-147 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

Criminal 22-147 (SRN/TNL)

03-13-2024

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Geraldo Jay Dilworth, Defendant.

Katharine T. Buzicky, Craig R. Baune, and Lauren Roso, United States Attorney's Office, District of Minnesota, for the United States Geraldo Jay Dilworth, Pro Se Defendant


Katharine T. Buzicky, Craig R. Baune, and Lauren Roso, United States Attorney's Office, District of Minnesota, for the United States

Geraldo Jay Dilworth, Pro Se Defendant

ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Defendant/Petitioner Geraldo Jay Dilworth's Pro Se Motion to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. No. 67] (“2255 Motion”) and his Pro Se Motion for the Suppression Hearing Transcript [Doc. No. 68].

Mr. Dilworth did not file a memorandum in support of his 2255 Motion. In his 2255 Motion, he states in a single sentence, “I am requesting this honorable court for a 2255 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Def.'s 2255 Mot. at 1.) This filing fails to meet the requirements of Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Among the requirements of Rule 2, a 2255 motion must “specify all the grounds for relief available to the moving party”, “state the facts supporting each ground”, and “state the relief requested.” R. Governing § 2255 Proceedings 2(b)(1)-(3). The Court therefore ORDERS Mr. Dilworth to file a memorandum that more fully sets for the basis for relief WITHIN 30 DAYS. Should he fail to do so, his 2255 Motion will be denied as deficient under Rule 2. If he files a memorandum, the Court will conduct a preliminary review of the motion under Rule 4(b) before directing the Government to respond.

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings provides,

The judge who receives the motion must promptly examine it. If it plainly appears from the motion, any attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings that the moving part is not entitled to relief, the judge must dismiss the motion and direct the clerk to notify the moving party. If the motion is not dismissed, the judge must order the United States attorney to file an answer, motion, or other response within a fixed time, or to take other action the judge may order.
R. Governing § 2255 Proceedings 4(b).

As to Mr. Dilworth's Motion for the Suppression Hearing Transcript [Doc. No. 68], it is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

United States v. Dilworth

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Mar 13, 2024
Criminal 22-147 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Dilworth

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Geraldo Jay Dilworth, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

Criminal 22-147 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2024)