Opinion
Case No. 2:10-cr-00284 MCE
02-21-2013
TODD D. LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant DIEP VU DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant HUNG PHAM DAVID FISCHER Attorney for Defendant THUY TRAN MARK REICHEL Attorney for Defendant CUONG LONG
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
TODD D. LERAS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2918
AMENDED STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING
STATUS CONFERENCE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Attorney Erin Radekin on behalf of Defendant Diep Vu, Attorney Dina Santos on behalf of Defendant Hung Pham, Attorney David Fischer on behalf of Defendant Thuy Tran, and Attorney Mark Reichel on behalf of Defendant Cuong Long, that the status conference scheduled for February 21, 2013, be continued to Marh 14, 2013.
The request to continue the status conference is made on the ground that some of the defense counsel are engaged in plea negotiations with the government and nearing final resolution. Other defendants have provided additional information to the government for follow-up investigation regarding appropriate disposition of the matters as to their clients.
All parties agree that an exclusion of time is appropriate under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare). All defense counsel agree to this request and have authorized Assistant United States Attorney Todd D. Leras to sign this stipulation on their behalf.
By: _______________
TODD D. LERAS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
By: _______________
ERIN RADEKIN
Attorney for Defendant
DIEP VU
By: _______________
DINA SANTOS
Attorney for Defendant
HUNG PHAM
By: _______________
DAVID FISCHER
Attorney for Defendant
THUY TRAN
By: _______________
MARK REICHEL
Attorney for Defendant
CUONG LONG
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The status conference set for February 21, 2013, is continued to March 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
2. Based on the stipulations and representations of the parties, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare) up to and including March 14, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE