From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Sep 11, 2020
CRIMINAL NO. 2:18-909 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 2:18-909

09-11-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. LARRY JOSEPH DIAZ, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Larry Joseph Diaz's Emergency Motion for Reduction in Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (D.E. 72), to which the Government has responded (D.E. 74). For the reasons stated herein, the motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2018, Defendant pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute 23.98 kilograms of cocaine. He has served roughly seven months (10%) of his 70-month sentence and has a projected release date, after good time credit, of January 19, 2025. Defendant now moves the Court to reduce his sentence to time served with a "restrictive supervised release term" because he recently recovered from COVID-19 and his underlying medical conditions (hypertension and high cholesterol) make him particularly vulnerable to severe illness or death should he become reinfected while in prison. Counsel for Defendant submitted a request for home confinement to the warden at Oakdale FCC on April 30, 2020, but the request was denied. Counsel submitted a request for compassionate release with the warden on May 19, 2020, but that request was also denied.

II. LEGAL STANDARD

The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), authorizes a court to reduce a defendant's sentence under limited circumstances:

(c) Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment.—The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that—
(1) in any case—
(A) the court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if it finds that—
(i) extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction . . . and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (emphasis added).

The applicable United States Sentencing Commission policy statement provides that extraordinary and compelling reasons for early release exist where:

(A) Medical Condition of the Defendant.
(i) The defendant is suffering from a terminal illness (i.e., a serious and advanced illness with an end of life trajectory). A specific prognosis of life expectancy (i.e., a
probability of death within a specific time period) is not required. Examples include metastatic solid-tumor cancer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), end-stage organ disease, and advanced dementia.

(ii) The defendant is—
(I) suffering from a serious physical or medical condition,
(II) suffering from a serious functional or cognitive impairment, or
(III) experiencing deteriorating physical or mental health because of the aging process,

that substantially diminishes the ability of the defendant to provide self-care within the environment of a correctional facility and from which he or she is not expected to recover.

(B) Age of the Defendant. -
The defendant is (i) at least 65 years old; (ii) is experiencing a serious deterioration in physical or mental health because of the aging process; and (iii) has served at least 10 years or 75 percent of his or her term of imprisonment, whichever is less;

(C) Family Circumstances. -
(i) The death or incapacitation of the caregiver of the defendant's minor child or minor children.

(ii) The incapacitation of the defendant's spouse or registered partner when the defendant would be the only available caregiver for the spouse or registered partner.

(D) Other Reasons. -
As determined by the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, there exists in the defendant's case an extraordinary or compelling reason other than, or in combination with, the reasons described in subdivisions (A) through (C).

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(1)(A), Application Note 1.

Even if "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for early release exist, the Guidelines' policy statements provide for a reduction in sentence only if a defendant "is not a danger to the safety of any other person or the community, as provided in 18 U.S.C. §3142(g)." U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(2). Factors relevant to this inquiry include: (1) the nature and circumstances of the offenses of conviction, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, or involves a minor victim, a controlled substance, or a firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (2) the weight of the evidence; (3) the defendant's history and characteristics; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the defendant's release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).

The Court must also consider whether a reduction is consistent with the applicable section 3553(a) factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13. The applicable statutory factors include, among others: the defendant's history and characteristics; the nature and circumstances of the offense; the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense; the need to deter criminal conduct and protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; the need to provide the defendant with, among other things, any needed medical treatment; and the various kinds of sentences available. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a)(1)-(7).

With respect to motions for compassionate release based on COVID-19:

A review of a motion for release based on COVID-19 is highly fact-intensive and dependent on the specific conditions of confinement and medical circumstances faced by the defendant. Hence, a prisoner cannot satisfy his burden of proof by simply citing to nationwide COVID-19 statistics,
asserting generalized statements on conditions of confinement within the BOP, or making sweeping allegations about a prison's ability or lack thereof to contain an outbreak. . . . [T]he rampant spread of the coronavirus and the conditions of confinement in jail, alone, are not sufficient grounds to justify a finding of extraordinary and compelling circumstances. Rather, those circumstances are applicable to all inmates who are currently imprisoned and hence are not unique to any one person.
United States v. Koons, 2020 WL 1940570, at *4 & n.8 (W.D. La. Apr. 21, 2020) (citing United States v. Raia, 954 F.3d 594, 597 (3d Cir. 2020)).

"In general, the defendant has the burden to show circumstances meeting the test for compassionate release." United States v. Stowe, 2019 WL 4673725, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2019).

III. ANALYSIS

Defendant is 35 years old and has served less than 10% of his sentence. He states that he "has already contracted COVID-19 once and is still struggling with the effects of the virus." D.E. 72, pp. 1-2. He further claims that his underlying medical conditions—hypertension and high cholesterol—make him particularly vulnerable to severe illness or death should he become reinfected while in prison.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, older adults (age 65 and above) and people of any age who have certain underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19. People with Certain Medical Conditions, CDC (July 17, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html. People of any age with the following conditions are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19: Cancer, Chronic kidney disease; COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); Immunocompromised state from solid organ transplant; Obesity; Serious heart conditions, such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies; Sickle cell disease; and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. People with the following conditions might be at an increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19: Asthma (moderate-to-severe); Cerebrovascular disease; Cystic fibrosis; Hypertension; Immunocompromised state from blood or bone marrow transplant, immune deficiencies, HIV, use of corticosteroids, or use of other immune weakening medicines; Neurologic conditions, such as dementia; Liver disease; Pregnancy; Pulmonary fibrosis; Smoking; Thalassemia; and Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Defendant's medical records show that he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, on or about April 16, 2020. D.E. 74-1, p. 4. He successfully recovered after four days of a dry cough, pain, fever, general malaise, and loss of appetite. D.E. 74-2, p. 55. By April 20, Defendant had a cough, no fever, no chills, no nausea, no vomiting, no stomach pain, and blood pressure of 126/84; he was pleasant, cooperative, and within normal limits. Id., pp. 30-31. Defendant was an "asymptomatic person in quarantine" until June 25, when he was released from isolation after he tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. D.E. 74-1, p. 5; 74-2, p. 126. While Defendant's blood pressure was "elevated" on February 25 and April 16 (D.E. 74-1, p. 4), there was no diagnosis of hypertension, and he repeatedly reported that he had no history of hypertension. D.E. 74-2, pp. 75, 80, 120. There is also nothing to indicate that Defendant ever became severely ill from COVID-19 or is still suffering any effects of the virus.

"The immune response, including duration of immunity, to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet understood. Patients infected with other betacoronaviruses (MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43), the genus to which SARS-CoV-2 belongs, are unlikely to be re-infected shortly (e.g., 3 months or more) after they recover. However, more information is needed to know whether similar immune protection will be observed for patients with COVID-19." https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/faq.html (last visited September 11, 2020). --------

Based on this record, the Court finds that extraordinary and compelling reasons do not exist that would warrant compassionate release.

IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Emergency Motion for Reduction in Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) (D.E. 72) is DENIED.

ORDERED September 11, 2020 .

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Sep 11, 2020
CRIMINAL NO. 2:18-909 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. LARRY JOSEPH DIAZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Sep 11, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 2:18-909 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tovar

Federal courts throughout the country repeatedly deny requests for compassionate release where, like Tovar,…

United States v. Fye

Courts have repeatedly denied motions for compassionate release filed by prisoners who, like Fye, have…