From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Devers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
No. CR S 10-0223 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR S 10-0223 JAM

02-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE DEVERS, Defendant.

PHILIP A. FERRARI Assistant U.S. Attorney MARK REICHEL Counsel for Defendant CONNIE DEVERS


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
PHILIP FERRARI
TODD PICKLES
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700

STIPULATION AND

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF

STATUS CONFERENCE


Date: March 19, 2013

Hon.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America and defendant Connie Devers, by and through their respective counsel, that the status conference in the above-captioned matter set for Tuesday, February 26, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, March 19, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.

The parties request that the Court exclude from calculation under the Speedy Trial Act the time from the date of the originally set status conference, February 26, 2013, through the date of the status conference set for March 19, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(4) [defendant physically unable to stand trial] (Local Code N). Counsel for Ms. Devers and the government are in the process of securing an update as to her physical condition and prognosis and require more time to do so. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: ________________________

PHILIP A. FERRARI

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: ________________________

MARK REICHEL

Counsel for Defendant

CONNIE DEVERS

IT IS ORDERED that the status conference currently set for February 26, 2013, is vacated, and a new status conference is set for March 19, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. For the reasons stipulated to by the parties, good cause exists pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(4), and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act through March 19, 2013, pursuant to local code N. For the reasons set forth in the stipulation, the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Devers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
No. CR S 10-0223 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Devers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE DEVERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

No. CR S 10-0223 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)