From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Denny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. CR-S-12-386 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CR-S-12-386 JAM

04-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVAN DENNY Defendants.

MARK J. REICHEL, State Bar #155034 THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK J. REICHEL Attorney for Defendant EVAN DENNY BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney MARK J. REICHEL for: JUSTIN LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


MARK J. REICHEL, State Bar #155034
THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK J. REICHEL
Attorney for Defendant
EVAN DENNY

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

CONTINUANCE OF STATUS

CONFERENCE; ORDER


Judge: Hon. JOHN A. MENDEZ

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JUSTIN LEE, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant DENNY, that the present dates for the status hearing be re calendared for May 7, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.

This continuance is requested as defense counsel needs adequate time to prepare for the case, and the defense is still reviewing the discovery and will be researching matters. As well, defense counsel will be in negotiations with the government in an effort to resolve the case.

Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation is lodged, through May 7, 2013 should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

Respectfully submitted,

MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ.

MARK J. REICHEL

Attorney for defendant

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MARK J. REICHEL for:

JUSTIN LEE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

________________________

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Denny

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. CR-S-12-386 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Denny

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVAN DENNY Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. CR-S-12-386 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)