From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Delgado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2015
CASE NO. 1:04-CR-05208 AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:04-CR-05208 AWI

11-06-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGIO CHAVEZ DELGADO, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING DEFEND ANT'S MOTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

The defendant has filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), seeking a reduction in his sentence on the basis of Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which revises the Drug Quantity Table in USSG § 2D1.1 and reduces by two levels the offense level applicable to many drug trafficking offenses. The Government has opposed the motion on the basis that the defendant is not eligible for a reduction under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. For the following reasons, the Court will deny the defendant's motion.

Section 3582(c)(2) authorizes district courts to modify an imposed sentence "in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission." United States v. Dunn, 728 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2013). Effective November 1, 2014, the Commission promulgated Amendment 782, which generally revised the Drug Quantity Table and chemical quantity tables across drug and chemical types. The Commission also voted to make Amendment 782 retroactively applicable to previously sentenced defendants.

However, pursuant to U.S.S.G. Section 1B1.10 (a)(2)(B): "A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if . . . an amendment listed in subsection (c) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range." U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 (a)(2)(B). A district court's authority to modify a sentenced is constrained by the Sentencing Commission. Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826 (2010).

In this case, the final Presentence Report recommended a base offense level of 38 pursuant to USSG § 2D1.1, as the amount of methamphetamine involved in the case was 5 kilograms of actual methamphetamine. Under the amended guideline, the base offense level for 5 kilograms of actual methamphetamine is still 38. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1). Applying the same three level departure applied by the sentencing court, for acceptance of responsibility, results in a total offense level of 35. Based on that figure and the established criminal history category of I, the defendant's sentencing range remains168 to 210 months. Because the pertinent amendment does not result in a different sentencing range, the defendant is not eligible for a sentencing reduction pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c). United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 673-74 (9th Cir. 2009).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's motion for a reduction in sentence is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2015

/s/_________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Delgado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2015
CASE NO. 1:04-CR-05208 AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Delgado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SERGIO CHAVEZ DELGADO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:04-CR-05208 AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)