From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. DeLacruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cr-18-Oc-28TBS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cr-18-Oc-28TBS

01-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE DELACRUZ, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING PLEADING

This case comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion Requesting Appointment of Appellate Counsel (Doc. No. 30, filed December 5, 2011).

The Court notes that the motion was filed by Defendant in a pro se capacity although Defendant has counsel. Defendant's attention is directed to Rule 2.03(d), Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, which provides in pertinent part:

Any party for whom a general appearance of counsel has been made shall not thereafter take any step or be heard in the case in proper person, absent prior leave of Court; nor shall any party, having previously elected to proceed in proper person, be permitted to obtain special or intermittent appearances of counsel except upon such conditions as the Court may specify.

Defendant has not sought or received leave of Court to file the above-referenced motion. Accordingly, the motion shall be disregarded by the Court and is hereby STRICKEN from the record.

DONE AND ORDERED at Orlando, Florida, this _______ day of January, 2012.

_____________________

JOHN ANTON II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

OrlP-31/24

Jose Delacruz

Counsel of Record


Summaries of

United States v. DeLacruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cr-18-Oc-28TBS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. DeLacruz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE DELACRUZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cr-18-Oc-28TBS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2012)