Opinion
Case No. 12-132 WBS
02-28-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ, Defendant.
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney M.Petrik for Michelle Prince MICHELLE PRINCE Assistant U.S. Attorney
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorneys for Defendant
IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO
APRIL 22, 2013, AT 9:30 A.M.
Date: April 22, 2013
Judge: William B. Shubb
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for March 4, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., and reset it for April 22, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.
Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery, to review a proposed plea agreement, and to confer with his client.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through April 22, 2013, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER
Acting Federal Defender
______________
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
M.Petrik for Michelle Prince
MICHELLE PRINCE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on April 22, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
_______________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE