From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dearth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 8, 2015
13-287 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913 Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney

          LEE S. BICKLEY Assistant U.S. Attorney


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO FEBRUARY 27, 2015, AT 9:00 A.M.

          Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

         The parties stipulate, through respective counsel, that the Court should continue the status conference set on January 9, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., to February 27, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

         Defense counsel requires further time to confer with Ms. Dearth about discovery, and to conduct further investigation. Defense counsel requires further time to gather medical records regarding Ms. Dearth. Defense counsel also requires further time to negotiate with government counsel regarding a potential settlement. Personal meetings between defense counsel and Ms. Dearth present logistical difficulties because she resides in Shasta County. The acquisition of medical records has proven more difficult than anticipated.

         For these reasons, counsel and the defendant agree that the Court should exclude the time from January 9, 2015, through February 27, 2015, when it computes the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7), and Local Code T4.

         Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and continuity of counsel. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders the status conference rescheduled for February 27, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. The Court orders the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including February 27, 2015, excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7), and Local Code T4.


Summaries of

United States v. Dearth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 8, 2015
13-287 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Dearth

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEMETRI DEARTH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

13-287 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2015)