From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Deal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 14, 2017
No. 16-20133 (5th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-20133

07-14-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFERY ARNOLD DEAL, Defendant-Appellant.


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-336-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Jeffery Arnold Deal pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with two counts of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him to concurrent terms of 63 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

On appeal, Deal challenges the calculation of his guidelines range of imprisonment under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), which states that the base offense level is 20 if the offense occurred subsequent to a felony conviction for a crime of violence. He avers that his Texas conviction for robbery no longer qualifies as a crime of violence because the former residual clause and accompanying commentary of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2) are invalid in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). That argument is unavailing, see Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 892 (2017), and Texas robbery qualifies as an enumerated crime of violence under the former commentary to § 4B1.2, see United States v. Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 376, 380-81 (5th Cir. 2006), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 547-63 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc); United States v. Moore, 635 F.3d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 2011); United States v. Velasco, 465 F.3d 633, 641 n.9 (5th Cir. 2006) (definitions of crime of violence set forth in U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.2 and 2L1.2 are treated interchangeably). Because the offense qualifies as an enumerated crime of violence, we need not address Deal's additional argument that Texas robbery does not constitute a crime of violence under § 4B1.2 because it lacks the element of use, threatened use, or attempted use of force. See United States v. Olalde-Hernandez, 630 F.3d 372, 376 (5th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Deal

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 14, 2017
No. 16-20133 (5th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Deal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFERY ARNOLD DEAL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 14, 2017

Citations

No. 16-20133 (5th Cir. Jul. 14, 2017)

Citing Cases

Rosemond v. United States

The Fifth Circuit has held that a conviction under Texas Penal Code 29.02 qualifies as an enumerated crime of…