From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davis

United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa
Oct 22, 2021
1:20-cr-00040-SMR-HCA-4 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 22, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cr-00040-SMR-HCA-4

10-22-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON ROBERT DAVIS, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

HELEN C. ADAMS CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

The United States of America and the Defendant, having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P. and L. Cr. R 11. The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Second Superseding Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary as to each count, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent factual basis concerning each of the essential elements of such offense. There is no plea agreement. I, therefore, recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, that a pre-sentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Davis

United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa
Oct 22, 2021
1:20-cr-00040-SMR-HCA-4 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 22, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON ROBERT DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Iowa

Date published: Oct 22, 2021

Citations

1:20-cr-00040-SMR-HCA-4 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 22, 2021)