From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
No. 3:20-CR-0575-X (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:20-CR-0575-X

03-25-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JONATHAN DEAN DAVIS


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This is a criminal case involving alleged counts of wire fraud and money laundering. The United States filed a Second Motion in Limine [Doc. No. 69], as did the Defendant [Doc. No. 81]. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES both motions as untimely.

Discussion

The Court's initial Pretrial Order set this case for trial on February 1, 2021 and set the deadline for "all pretrial motions" twenty-one days before trial, effectively January 11, 2021. Both sides initially complied with this deadline and filed motions in limine by the deadline. After this deadline expired, the Court issued an Amended Criminal Trial Scheduling Order that continued the trial for the ends the justice but did not establish a future deadline for motions in limine. Therefore the deadline for motions in limine remained January 11, 2021. Sensing that Lazarus had risen from the grave, the United States filed a second motion in limine on March 8. And rather than object to the motion as untimely, Davis followed suit with his own untimely second motion in limine on March 15. But two wrongs do not make a right, and March 8 and 15 are after January 11. Accordingly, the Court DENIES both motions as untimely.

Doc. No. 12 at 1.

Doc. No. 43. Because the ends of justice necessitated the trial continuance due to unique issues created by COVID-19, rather than any problem with the case, the Court did not require and did not order further development of pretrial limine issues.

The Court is, however, concerned by certain categories of evidence identified in the Defendant's motion, namely limine issues A, B, C, E, and J.6.e. The Government should signal its intent at trial to introduce evidence, testimony, or arguments related to these issues to allow for objection and evaluation before introduction.

Issues A, B, and C generally involve evidence of third-party actions or statements being attributed to the Defendant.

Specifically, evidence of payments received from the Department of Veterans Affairs for the purpose of proving money laundering. --------

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2021.

/s/_________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 25, 2021
No. 3:20-CR-0575-X (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JONATHAN DEAN DAVIS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2021

Citations

No. 3:20-CR-0575-X (N.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2021)